AT. [ln] became [ll]; [ln] > [ll]
The clearest examples of the sound change [ln] > [ll] appear in Old Noldorin, such as ᴹ✶khalnā́ > ON. khalla (Ety/KHAL²) or ᴹ✶skelnā > ON. skhella (Ety/SKEL). There are examples in Sindarin as well: ✶melnā > S. mell (PE17/41). A note in Outline of Phonology from the 1950s attributes this change to Telerin:
rn, rm, lm all remained intact [in Quenya] and were favored groups; but ln became ld (T. ll) (PE19/100).
Given that this change took place in Old Noldorin and at a later conceptual stage seemed to be shared by Sindarin and Telerin, it seems likely this phonetic development occurred in the Ancient Telerin period. An identical change occurred at a similarly ancient period in Welsh, between PIE and Proto Celtic (WGHC/§99iii).
Conceptual Development: Given ln combinations in Gnomish such as G. ulna-, it seems unlikely this phonetic change was part of the earliest versions of the language.
Neo-Sindarin: Since [ln] > [ll] was such an ancient change, I assume it is no longer an active sound change in modern Sindarin and I further assume ln is a licit combination in modern (Neo) Sindarin compounds like ᴺS. alnad and ᴺS. molnel. By comparison, [ln] > [ll] occurred in Proto Celtic, but [ln] is a licit combination in modern Welsh compounds. However, there are no attested examples of ln in the Sindarin/Noldorin corpus.
Reference ✧ PE19/100
Phonetic Rule Elements
|
> |
|
✧ PE19/100 (ln > ll) |
Phonetic Rule Examples
kʰolnina > kʰollina | ln > ll | √KHOL > S. hollen | ✧ PE17/98 |
melnā > mellā | ln > ll | ✶melnā > S. mell | ✧ PE17/41 |
ON. [ln] became [ll]; [ln] > [ll]
Phonetic Rule Elements
|
> |
|
Phonetic Rule Examples
kʰalnā > kʰallā | ln > ll | ᴹ✶khalnā́ > ON. khalla | ✧ Ety/KHAL² |
ndulna > ndulla | ln > ll | ᴹ✶ndulna > N. doll | ✧ Ety/DUL |
skalnā > skallā | ln > ll | ᴹ✶skalnā > ON. skhalla | ✧ Ety/SKAL¹ |
skelnā > skellā | ln > ll | ᴹ✶skelnā > ON. skhella | ✧ Ety/SKEL |