Ilk. double spirants became single; [{xθ}θ|xx] > [θ|x]
It appears that in Ilkorin, double spirants reduced to single spirants. The clearest example of this is ᴹ✶b’rittē > [briθθe >] Ilk. brith [briθ] (Ety/BIRÍT). Another possible example is ᴹ√TAK > [takka > taxxa >] Ilk. tâch [tāx] (Ety/TAK) as suggested by Helge Fauskanger (AL-Ilkorin/tâch). In the case of primitive [kt] or [ktʰ], it seems the development was to [xθ] and then [θ], for example: ᴹ✶oktā > [oxθa >] Ilk. oth (Ety/OKTĀ). There are no examples of the development for other spirant pairs, but perhaps the preceding spirant assimilated to the following one as a general rule. If so, the assimilation could also have occurred earlier, when the sounds were still stops (as suggested by Helge Fausganger, AL-Ilkorin/oth).
Phonetic Rule Elements
|
> |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
> |
|
Phonetic Rule Examples
taxxa > taxa | xx > x | ᴹ√TAK > Ilk. tāch | ✧ Ety/TAK |
luxθe > luθe | xθ > θ | ᴹ√LUK > Dor. luth | ✧ Ety/LUK |
luxθiēne > luθiēne | xθ > θ | ᴹ✶luktı̯ēnē > Dor. Luthien | ✧ Ety/LUK |
oxθa > oθa | xθ > θ | ᴹ✶OKTĀ > Ilk. oth | ✧ Ety/OKTĀ |
-aθθa > -aθ | θθ > θ | ᴹ✶-atta > Ilk. -ath | ✧ PE21/57 |
bereθθe > bereθe | θθ > θ | ᴹ√BER > Ilk. bereth | ✧ Ety/BER |
bríθθe > bríθe | θθ > θ | ᴹ✶b’rittē > Ilk. brith | ✧ Ety/BIRÍT |
mboθθo > mboθo | θθ > θ | ᴹ√MBOTH > Dor. moth | ✧ Ety/MBOTH |