[Home] » Languages » Neo-Quenya »  Neo-Quenya Words[Search] [← Previous] [Next →][Search]

Q. hlócë (hlóki-) n. “reptile, snake, serpant, worm” (Category: Snake)

Q. hlócë (hlóci-), n. “reptile, snake, serpant, worm, *lizard; [ᴹQ.] dragon” (Category: Snake)
ᴱQ. fent “serpent, dragon”
ᴱQ. lingwë “snake, worm”

A noun in Quenya Notes from 1957 (QN) with variants hlóke and lóke based on primitive ✶(s)lōkō “reptile, snake, worm” from the root √LOK “bend, loop”, so presumably having a similar meaning (PE17/160). Christopher Tolkien also had (h)lóke in The Silmarillion appendix, but gave it the glosses “snake, serpent” (SA/lok). Its Sindarin cognate lhûg points towards a Quenya form hlócë.

Conceptual Development: ᴱQ. lóke (lóki-) “snake” appeared all the way back in the Qenya Lexicon of the 1910s under the early root ᴱ√LOKO “twine, twist, curl” (QL/55). It was also mentioned with the gloss “snake” in the Official Name List for the Lost Tales (PE13/105) and the Name-list to the Fall of Gondolin (PE15/28). It appeared in the contemporaneous Gnomish Lexicon as related to G. ulug “dragon” (GL/74), and in The Lost Tales proper lóke was given as the “the Eldar name [of] the worms of Melko”, that is dragons (LT1/85).

In The Etymologies of the 1930s, Tolkien glossed ᴹQ. lóke as “dragon” under the root ᴹ√LOK “great serpent, dragon” along with Noldorin cognate N. lhûg (Ety/LOK). It was followed by an in parenthesis, indicating a primitive form of *lōkī and a stem form of lóki-. Tolkien’s vacillation on its 1957 form was probably out of a desire to retain lhûg as the Sindarin form. In Noldorin of the 1930s an initial l was unvoiced to lh, but this was no longer true of Sindarin of the 1950s and 60s, so Sindarin lhûg required a corresponding Quenya form of hlócë.

Neo-Quenya: For purposes of Neo-Quenya, I recommend sticking with hlócë. Furthermore, since this Quenya word cannot be derived directly from ✶(s)lōkō, I would assume a primitive form slōkī and a stem form hlóci- compatible with its earlier appearances. Given the breadth of its glosses, I would assume the word can apply to any sinuous reptilian creature with or without legs, including lizards, snakes and dragons.

References ✧ PE17/160; SA/lok

Glosses

Variations

Element In

Cognates

Derivations

Phonetic Developments

(s)lōkō > hlóke [slōke] > [l̥ōke] ✧ PE17/160
lok- > (h)lókë [slōke] > [l̥ōke] ✧ SA/lok

ᴹQ. lóke (lóki-) n. “dragon” (Category: Snake)

See Q. hlócë for discussion.

Reference ✧ Ety/LOK ✧ “dragon”

Element In

Cognates

Derivations

Phonetic Developments

ᴹ√LOK > lóke [lōke] ✧ Ety/LOK

ᴱQ. lóke (lóki-) n. “snake, dragon” (Category: Snake)

See Q. hlócë for discussion.

References ✧ GL/74; LT2/85; LT2A/Foalókë; LT2I/lókë; PE13/105; PE15/28; QL/55

Glosses

Variations

Inflections

lōki- stem ✧ QL/55

Element In

Cognates

Derivations

Phonetic Developments

ᴱ√LOKO > lōke [lōki] > [lōke] ✧ QL/55

ᴹQ. lungu n. “dragon” (Category: Dragon)

References ✧ PE21/15

Glosses

Variations

Inflections

lunguita partitive-plural ✧ PE21/15

Derivations