S. later [ei] became [ai] in final syllables; [-eiC|-ei] > [-aiC|-ai]

S. later [ei] became [ai] in final syllables; [-eiC|-ei] > [-aiC|-ai]

In Sindarin the diphthong [ei] developed into [ai] in final syllables (including monosyllables), a sound changes noted by David Salo (GS/§4.199, 2004). Roman Rausch examined this phonetic development in great detail (including its earlier conceptual variations in the 1920s and 1930s) in his article On the Diphthongs ei, ai in Noldorin and Sindarin (DEANS, 2008); my conclusions mostly align with his. This sound change did not apply to primitive diphthong [ei], which had already become [ī] in the Old Sindarin period. It did apply to later diphthongs that arose from the vocalizations of spirants or i-intrusion:

As shown by the last two examples, earlier sound changes like i-fronting and a-affection meant that the diphthong [ei] could also arise in words where the primitive base vowel was not [e], and these too ultimately produced the diphthong [ai]. Here are some polysyllabic examples:

This change of [ei] to [ai] is the only way the diphthong [ai] could appear in Sindarin, since earlier the diphthong [ai] became [ae], both the primitive diphthong [ai] as well as diphthongs arising from the vocalization of spirants. Where [ei] appeared in a non-final syllable, however, it survived:

This means that in general, [ai] and [ei] were in complimentary positions: [ai] in final syllables and [ei] in non-final syllables. This seems to remain an active phonetic rule in Sindarin, so that newly-formed compounds continue to obey this rule. For example, consider the name S. Ar-Feiniel “White Lady” (S/60) which seems to contain S. fain “white”. There are a handful of examples where [ei] appears in final syllables, however. These can be explained as either (a) archaic forms or (b) remnants of Noldorin ideas (see below). A partial list of exceptions includes:

The last of these was explicitly marked as archaic, and was replaced in colloquial Sindarin by minui. There are a number of examples where [ai] appears in non-final syllables, and these examples are more difficult to explain:

One side effect of this sound change is that all primitive adjectives of the form [-aCya], [-eCya] or [-iCya] became [-aiC], since i-fronting pushed [a] to [e] and a-affection pulled [i] to [e], and the diphthong [ei] that resulted from i-intrusion became [ai] in all these cases. It is a somewhat open question how adjectives of the form [-oCya] or [-uCya] developed: see the entry on how [œi] became [ui] or [y].

Conceptual Developments: Tolkien vacillated on whether [ei] became [ai] at various periods of his life.

Gnomish Developments (1910s): An early chart of Gnome Vowels shows primitive ai was usually preserved, but primitive ei usually became ê (PE15/13). As discussed by Roman Rausch in his Historical Phonology of Goldogrin (HPG/§1.2), these two sound changes were well represented among words in the Gnomish Lexicon, but where ei arose later from the vocalization of spirants, it became ai (HPG/§2.6). Unlike Sindarin, this seems to occur in all syllables, not just final ones:

The diphthong [ei] did not appear in non-archaic words in the Gnomish Lexicon, but it did start to appear in some words in the Gnomish Lexicon Slips, probably representing a conceptual shift where ei could be preserved in non-final syllables (see Early Noldorin Developments below):

Some of these examples even seem show ai > ei, but most of these are probably the result of newly-introduced i-affection ([a] > [e] before [i]), since the diphthong ai continues to appear in the Gnomish Lexicon Slips:

Early Noldorin Developments (1920s): In a chart of Early Noldorin diphthongal changes from the 1920s, Tolkien indicated that generally [ei] > [ai] (PE15/64). As discussed by Roman Rausch in his Historical Phonologies of Ilkorin, Telerin and Noldorin around 1923 (HPITN/§4.2.4), often primitive [ei] became [ui] instead. However, where [ei] arose later from vocalization of spirants, it almost always became [ai] in final syllables, much like later Sindarin (HPITN/§4.1.3; §4.2.5):

But in non-final syllables [ei] remained:

Early Noldorin plural patterns also indicate that ei > ai where it resulted from i-intrusion, similar to the Sindarin plural pattern:

Unlike the normal plural patterns of Noldorin and Sindarin of the 1930s and later, in the Early Noldorin of the 1920s i-intrusion could penetrate clusters of two consonants, as seen in the examples above. Furthermore, for plurals of words ending in an r-cluster of consonants, it seems ei did not become ai, but rather reduced to e:

In his article On the Diphthongs ei, ai in Noldorin and Sindarin (DEANS/§4.5), Roman Rausch suggested that this might once again have become the normal pattern for plurals in Sindarin, with [ei] surviving before liquids [l] and [r] and reducing to [e], based on the three examples S. eilph plural of S. alph “swan” (UT/265), S. nern plural of S. narn “tale” (MR/373), and sern plural of (N. of the 1940s) sarn “stone” (WR/132). I am not convinced, however, since nern and sern can also be explained by consonant clusters resisting i-intrusion, which was the most common pattern from the 1930s and later. There was variant plural sairn (rather than **seirn) beside sern (WR/132), which I think is further evidence that these examples were not a restoration of Early Noldorin plural patterns, although S. eilph remains a strange and hard-to-explain outlier.

In any case, it seems that the normal phonetic development patterns in the Early Noldorin of the 1920s were that when a later diphthong [ei] arose from spirant vocalization or i-intrusion, then it (a) remained in non-final syllables and (b) became [ai] in final syllables, including monosyllables, except (c) where [ei] appeared before an r-cluster, in which case it reduced to [e].

Noldorin Developments (1930s): Tolkien described the development of the diphthong [ei] in some detail in a chart of diphthongal developments from his notes on the Noldorin usage of the Feanorian Alphabet from the 1930s (PE22/39, relevant information only):

Old short epenthetic diphthongs:

  • [ĕı̯] e or affected a + epenthetic ı̯. later became either [e] or becoming long was identified with [e͡i].
  • [œ̆ı̯] affected ŏ, ŭ in unstressed syllables + epenthetic ı̯. hÖ| œi later > ei, and so to [e] or [e͡i].

The long diphthongs — ON diphthongs, diphthongization of ON ō, or new diphthongs from short vowel + vowel (in contractions or in contact with vocalized ʒ, χ), or from long vowels + epenthetic ı̯ ...

  • [e͡i] e + ʒ, χ or affected a + ʒ, χ; the same + i in contraction. Later length[ening] of ĕi. l`B l~B later G — usually (beside l~B).

Here the later diphthong [ei] that arose from either spirantal vocalizations or i-intrusion did not develop into [ai], but rather survived if long (typical of monosyllables) and reduced to e if short (mainly in the final syllables of polysyllables). This is consistent with many of the examples in The Etymologies:

See also the examples in the entry on how [ei] sometimes became [e] in unstressed final syllables in Noldorin. Note that in Noldorin, since [ei] did not become [ai], it seems that [ei] from [-aCya], [-eCya] or [-iCya] blended with [œi] from [-oCya] and [-uCya] after [œ] became [e], and every one of these ultimately produced [eiC]:

As noted by Roman Rausch (DEANS/§3.6), Tolkien seems to have varied from this pattern in a number of places in The Etymologies. There are a fair number of examples where Tolkien vacillated between [ei] and [ai]:

Roman Rausch suggested (and I concur) that this was likely an early emergence of the Sindarin pattern (itself a partial restoration of the Early Noldorin pattern) whereby [ei] became [ai] in final syllables (DEANS/§3.6). There are no examples in The Etymologies of ei/ai vacillation in non-final syllables. Furthermore, as Tolkien wrote The Lord of the Rings drafts in the 1940s, ai in final syllables became the normal pattern:

This remained the case in the Sindarin of the 1950s and 60s, with sporadic exceptions as noted above. As suggested by Roman Rausch (DEANS/§3.6), it is possible that even in the 1930s ei > ai might have been a dialectical variation. In a deleted entry of The Etymologies, Tolkien gave N. Maiðros as the form of this name in the “Feanorian dialect”, more properly in other dialects Meiðros, reformed in Gondolin as Maeðros (EtyAC/MAƷ).

Summary of Conceptual Developments: In the Gnomish Lexicon of the 1910s, later diphthongs [ei] became [ai] universally and [ei] did not appear at all, but [ei] began to appear in non-final syllables in the Gnomish Lexicon Slips when i-affection was introduced. In the Early Noldorin of the 1920s, later [ei] survived in non-final syllables but became [ai] in final syllables, except before r-clusters where it reduced to [e]; this phonetic development occurred more often that it did in later conceptual stages, because in Early Noldorin consonant clusters did not resist i-intrusion. In the Noldorin of the 1930s, later diphthong [ei] generally survived in both final and non-final syllables, although it was sometimes reduced to [e] in polysyllables. By the 1940s, the Sindarin pattern began to emerge where [ei] once again became [ai] in final syllables, a partial restoration of the Early Noldorin pattern. At all conceptual stages, the primitive diphthong [ei] had a distinct phonetic development from the later diphthong [ei] that arose from the vocalization of spirants and i-intrusion, though the exact primitive developments also evolved over time.

Neo-Sindarin: It is usual in Neo-Sindarin writing to revise entries from The Etymologies with [ei] in final syllables to [ai] for better consistency with the Sindarin of The Lord of the Rings. Roman Rausch suggested (DEANS/§4.5) that Noldorin [ei] from [œi] should be adapted differently, however: see the entry on how [œi] became [ui] or [y].

Order (03300)

After 01000 [ɣ] vocalized before [l], [r], [m], [n] keglē > S. cail UT/282
After 02400 final [i] intruded into preceding syllable delya > deil > S. dail
pheryā > feir > S. fair
After 03200 [ai], [oi] became [ae], [oe] minya > mein > S. main VT42/25

Phonetic Rule Elements

[-eiC] > [-aiC]
[-ei] > [-ai]

Phonetic Rule Examples

eir > air -eiC > -aiC eryā > eir > S. air ✧ PE17/28
bein > bain -eiC > -aiC GWAN > S. bain ✧ PE17/154
bein > bain -eiC > -aiC banya > S. bain ✧ PE17/165
bein > bain -eiC > -aiC gwenyā > bein > S. bain ✧ PE17/191
beir > bair -eiC > -aiC mbā̆r > S. bair ✧ PE17/164
belein > belain -eiC > -aiC Balaniā > S. **Belain ✧ Let/427
beleiθ > belaiθ -eiC > -aiC mbelek > S. belaith ✧ PE17/115
deil > dail -eiC > -aiC delya > deil > S. dail ✧ PE17/151
deil > dail -eiC > -aiC delya > S. deil ✧ PE17/151
edeid > edaid -eiC > -aiC atatya > S. edaid ✧ VT42/26
edein > edain -eiC > -aiC Q. Atan > S. Edain ✧ WJ/387
edreiθ > edraiθ -eiC > -aiC rekti(e) > S. edraith ✧ PE17/38
elein > elain -eiC > -aiC elenyā > S. †elein ✧ PE17/139
eneid > enaid -eiC > -aiC HENET > enetya > S. enaid ✧ VT41/16
eveir > evair -eiC > -aiC Abarī > S. †Evair ✧ WJ/380
fein > fain -eiC > -aiC FAN > S. fain ✧ PE17/26
fein > fain -eiC > -aiC SPAN > S. fain ✧ PE17/36
fein > fain -eiC > -aiC phanyā > S. fain ✧ PE17/174
fein > fain -eiC > -aiC PHAN > S. fain ✧ PE17/179
feir > fair -eiC > -aiC pheryā > feir > S. fair ✧ PE17/181
feir > fair -eiC > -aiC PHERE > S. ferui ✧ PE17/181
geil > gail -eiC > -aiC gilyā > geil > S. gail ✧ PE17/152
gwein > gwain -eiC > -aiC WIN > S. gwein ✧ PE17/191
gwein > gwain -eiC > -aiC wanya > S. gwain ✧ PE17/150
gweiθ > gwaiθ -eiC > -aiC weg-tē > S. gwaith ✧ PE17/190
kei > kai -eiC > -aiC kegyā > S. cai ✧ UT/282
keil > kail -eiC > -aiC keglē > S. cail ✧ UT/282
lein > lain -eiC > -aiC ‽√LAN > S. #lain ✧ PE17/60
leix > laix -eiC > -aiC lisyā > liχı̯ā > leχı̯ > leich > S. laich ✧ PE17/148
lemein > lemain -eiC > -aiC laman(a)/lamān > S. levain ✧ WJ/416
mein > main -eiC > -aiC minya > mein > S. main ✧ VT42/25
neiθ > naiθ -eiC > -aiC nek-tē > neith > S. naith ✧ PE17/55
rein > rain -eiC > -aiC ran- > S. rain ✧ UT/242
rein > rain -eiC > -aiC RAN > S. -rain ✧ VT42/12
rein > rain -eiC > -aiC RAN > rein > S. rain ✧ VT42/13
reiθa- > raiθa- -eiC > -aiC RIK > S. raitha ✧ PE17/167
seid > said -eiC > -aiC SAT > S. said ✧ VT42/20
sedeir > sedair -eiC > -aiC satarŏ > S. sedair ✧ PE17/183
teiθ > taiθ -eiC > -aiC tek-tā > teith > S. taith ✧ PE17/43
telein > telain -eiC > -aiC talam- > S. telain ✧ PE17/52
teleir > telair -eiC > -aiC teleryā > S. teleir ✧ PE17/139

N. [ei] (sometimes) became [ai] in final syllables; [ei] > [ai]

GS/§4.199 GS/§4.232 @@@ Feanorian maið

Order (03300)

After 01000 [ɣ], [ŋ] vocalized before [l], [r], [m], [n] ᴹ√REG > rhein > N. rhain Ety/REG
After 02300 initial [r-], [l-] were unvoiced ᴹ✶(a)ranı̯ā > rhein > N. rhain
ᴹ√LEK > lhein > N. lhain
After 02400 voiceless stops voiced after vowels ᴹ✶mrekjā > breig > N. braig Ety/MERÉK
After 03100 [ai] became [oe] or [ae] ᴹ√REG > rhein > N. rhain Ety/REG

Phonetic Rule Elements

[ei] > [ai]

Phonetic Rule Examples

eiθ > aiθ ei > ai ᴹ√EK > N. aith ✧ Ety/EK
breig > braig ei > ai ᴹ✶mrekjā > breig > N. braig ✧ Ety/MERÉK
deinθaur > dainθaur ei > ai ᴹ✶ndani-thārō > N. Dainthor ✧ LR/188
erein > erain ei > ai ᴹ√ƷAR > N. erain ✧ Ety/ƷAR
geil > gail ei > ai ᴹ✶galyā > N. gail ✧ Ety/KAL
l̥ein > l̥ain ei > ai ᴹ√LEK > lhein > N. lhain ✧ Ety/LEK
r̥ein > r̥ain ei > ai ᴹ√REG > rhein > N. rhain ✧ Ety/REG
r̥ein > r̥ain ei > ai ᴹ✶(a)ranı̯ā > rhein > N. rhain ✧ EtyAC/RAN

ᴱN. [ei] became [ai]; [ei] > [ai]

Phonetic Rule Elements

[ei] > [ai] ✧ PE15/64 (eı̯ > ai); PE15/64 (eı̯ > ai)

G. later [ei] became [ai]; [ei] > [ai]

Phonetic Rule Elements

[ei] > [ai]

Phonetic Rule Examples

eiθ > aiθ ei > ai ᴱ✶eχtă- > G. aith¹ ✧ GL/18
eiθ > aiθ ei > ai ᴱ✶ektĭ > G. aith² ✧ GL/18
eiθaθ > aiθaθ ei > ai ᴱ✶eχt·taþ· > G. aithos ✧ GL/18
eiθi > aiθi ei > ai ‽ᴱ✶ektī > G. †aithi ✧ GL/18
eiθl > aiθl ei > ai ᴱ✶ektḷ > G. aithl ✧ GL/18
keiθl > kaiθl ei > ai ᴱ✶kekt(ǝ)lḗ > G. caithl ✧ GL/25
leis > lais ei > ai ᴱ✶leχ-sa > G. lais ✧ GL/53
meiðan > maiðan ei > ai ᴱ✶megđana > G. maidhon ✧ GL/56
meis > mais ei > ai ᴱ✶meχse > G. †mais ✧ GL/56
seiðan > saiðan ei > ai ᴱ✶sek’·ðana > G. Saidhon ✧ GL/66